I've spent
the last couple of days watching every Saw-movie again. Why? Just because I
could and I kinda liked them. So here's my comments after each one, written
directly after I saw each one of them.
Saw, now a
classic in the horror genre, and also a thriller that holds up very well. It
feels fresh and unique, even after six sequels and countless rip-off's. Leigh
Whannell's script (after a story by him and James Wan) plays a perfect game of
thriller ping-pong, keeping the mystery intact to the very end. I remember how
the twist made me jump, and I still think it's a good one - even if it feels
less logical the more I analyze it. Interesting is also how cheap it looks.
It's first now I can see clearly how everything is shot in one house, inside,
with quick production design and not always thought-through direction. But
still damn good.
I find SawII quite intriguing. Maybe it was just luck that this sequel wasn't based on an
original Saw-script? There's something that differs the one from the first,
something more than just a bigger cast. Can't put my finger on it. Anyway,
that's what makes it a good sequel, more unexpected. It's a bit more tricky to
keep every character alive and interesting, but it's not badly written here. The
twist is actually a damn fine twist, one of the best ones in the series. Still
not as magical and unique than the first.
Saw III was
the first one I saw in the theatre and boy, this is a lot nastier than the
first two - they're both quite lame regarding the graphic violence. But here! I
turned away my head a couple of times, including a lot of the skull-surgery
scene. The first time I saw it felt like the best sequel, but that feeling has
diminished a little bit. It's still a very exciting thriller, with a neat twist
and a couple of fun surprises. I also thing the acting in this one is the best
so far. This is also the sequel when things start to get confusing, and I still
have four movies left! Sigh...
When you
see every part of this series at least one year apart it's easy to mix them
with each other. I always thought that Saw IV was the weakest one, the big
letdown, but I must have confused it with the next one - maybe. This is
actually not a bad film. It has better pacing - and is shorter - than the Saw
III and kinda hangs together better. It still leaves one big question hanging
at the end and I'm not even sure they will bother to answer it. It's also nice
how it hangs together with the last part very carefully, and it wouldn't
surprise me if they where shot back-to-back. The twist is fine, but not the
best. Alright. Let see what the next one has to offer!
But what
the... I've always lived in that illusion was the worst one! But nooo, it's
actually a nice companion piece to the part before, both more or less a
deconstruction of the male ego. Part V have now - I need to say - the best cast
of them all. The ensemble victims are all excellent, which is needed to keep
the interest up. The weakest spot is, as usual, Costas Mandylor, who seem quite
detached to his character. He's okay, but not fantastic. And yeah, this part
has the simplest - but worst - final trap! Nasty as hell!
I totally
forgot, but Saw VI is the absolute weakest. Mostly because it's more visible
that the writers have run out of ideas and the flashbacks and earlier unknown
links between characters and scenes just doesn't work to the same degree as
earlier. I like most of the acting and there's some fine ideas, but it doesn't
hold together. The best thing with it is that it's very anti-capitalistic, and
keeps that message all through. Alright one left...
Saw 3D is
different in several way. First of all it's a lot more polished and brighter in
style than the rest, the blood and often the gore effects is red (almost pink
sometimes, which makes me think of almost every movie made in the seventies)
and cartoonish. It also, like Hellraiser: Hellworld, Jason Goes To Hell and New
Nightmare, acknowledges the crime as something commerical, something that can
be made money from. It takes one step out from the traditional storyline and
shows a little bit more around everything. I personally think Saw 3D is a fun
movie, one of the better ones and a lot better than the first. And it's also
very nice to see THAT character back in the... game.
That's all,
ffffolks.
2 comments:
"Still not as magical and unique than the first."
I think Saw 2 is the only one I have seen....I don´t remember much from it.
"Just because I could and I kinda liked them."
Damn straight, ninja....you shouldn´t need more excuse then that.
Saw franchise have never really had any appeal to me.....but....I need to see the rest....someday, someday ninja.
Good reviews, ninja...thanks.
Megatron
Love your look at the series.
Post a Comment